HPI: This type II skin, 24 yo man has been plagued with PFB
for 5 years. At age 19 he was treated for one year with minocyclin which he
accepted with no noticeable side effects for the first 4 months until he
believed his teeth were developing a a gray tinge. During treatment, the sites
inflammation diminished but ingrown hairs were still a problem despite not
shaving.
For the past year, he has had no treatment other than
washing his face daily with oil free "deep action exfoliating scrub"
from and moisturizing with Pond's Dry skin cream. He has also been plucking
ingrown hairs with tweezers. When cut he uses a topical "triple antibiotic
ointment to prevent secondary infection. He has encountered many "hair whorls"
which have grown completely under the skin. These hair whorls present as a hard
lump with a darker tint under his type II skin. He has been able to remove the
hairs which range in size from a half inch to an inch and a half with tweezers.
The ingrown hairs predominate on his jaw line and the
hair whorls solely occur under his ear lobe (along his jaw line). The left side
of his face is noticeably more affected than his right side. He attributes this
to a nervous habit of his in which he scratches and pulls out hairs on his face
in the affected region while he is working.
On Exam: He presents with numerous ingrown hairs on his right
and left jaw line and in the submental area. The ingrown neck hairs grow about
2 mm in length before growing back into the skin. He also has ingrown hairs
that have not surfaced and instead are growing shallowly underneath the surface
of the skin. Pustules develop at the sites of the ingrown hairs (both the hairs
that have not been able to grow out of the skin and the hairs that have grown
back into the skin).
Clinical Photo (taken by patient)
Lab and Pathology: Not applicable
Diagnosis: Pseudofolliculitis barbare with pili incarnati
Questions: Have you found a therapy that is successful in these patients? Antibiotics? Topicals? IPL or Alexandrite laser? Other?
References:
1.
Cook-Bolden FE, Barba A, Halder R, Taylor S . Twice-daily
applications of benzoyl peroxide 5%/clindamycin 1% gel versus vehicle in the
treatment of pseudofolliculitis barbae. Cutis.
2004 Jun;73(6 Suppl):18-24.
Abstract: Pseudofolliculitis barbae (PFB) is an inflammatory
disorder characterized by the formation of papules, pustules, and
hyperpigmentation as a result of ingrown hairs. It is estimated that PFB
affects 45% to 83% of black men who shave regularly. In this multicenter,
double-blind pilot study, men with 16 to 100 combined papules and pustules on
the face and neck were randomized to receive twice-daily benzoyl peroxide 5%/
clindamycin 1% (BP/C) gel (BenzaClin)(n = 47) or vehicle (n = 41) for 10 weeks.
Sixty-eight (77.3%) of the participants were black. All patients were required
to shave at least twice a week and to use a standardized shaving regimen
throughout the study. Clinical evaluations were performed at 2-week intervals.
The primary efficacy parameter was the percentage change from baseline in
lesion counts. At weeks 2, 4, and 6, mean percentage reductions from baseline
in combined papule and pustule counts were significantly greater with BP/C gel
compared with vehicle (P < or = .029). Treatment differences in favor of
active therapy were more pronounced in the subpopulations of black patients,
with least squares mean percentage reductions in papule and pustule counts
ranging from 38.2% at week 2 to 63.9% at week 10. Study medication was well
tolerated. These positive findings warrant further investigation of BP/C gel in
the treatment of patients with PFB.
2.
Tahra M Leheta.
COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF LONG PULSE ALEXANDRITE LASER AND INTENSE
PULSED LIGHT SYSTEMS FOR PSEUDOFOLLICULITIS BARBAE TREATMENT WITH ONE YEAR OF
FOLLOW UP. Indian J Dermatol. 2009
Oct-Dec; 54(4): 364–368. Free Full Text.
Abstract
Background:
Existing remedies for controlling pseudofolliculitis
barbae (PFB) are sometimes helpful; however the positive effects are often
short lived. The only definitive cure for PFB is permanent removal of the hair
follicle.
Aims:
Our aim was to compare the efficacy of the Alexandrite
laser with the intense pulsed light system in the treatment of PFB and to
follow up the recurrence.
Methods:
Twenty male patients seeking laser hair removal for
the treatment of PFB were enrolled in this study. One half of the face was
treated with the long-pulse Alexandrite laser and the other half was treated
with the IPL system randomly. The treatment outcome and any complications were
observed and followed up for one year.
Results:
All patients exhibited a statistically significant
decrease in the numbers of papules. Our results showed that the
Alexandrite-treated side needed seven sessions to reach about 80% improvement,
while the IPL-treated side needed 10-12 sessions to reach about 50%
improvement. During the one year follow up period, the Alexandrite-treated side
showed recurrence in very minimal areas, while the IPL-treated side showed
recurrence in bigger areas.
Conclusions:
Our results showed that both systems might improve PFB but Alexandrite
laser was more effective at reducing PFB than IPL.